Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Mary Elizabeth Oneill v. Broadview" by Second District Court of Appeal of Florida ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Mary Elizabeth Oneill v. Broadview

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Mary Elizabeth Oneill v. Broadview
  • Author : Second District Court of Appeal of Florida
  • Release Date : January 22, 1959
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 60 KB

Description

In her complaint plaintiff alleged the execution of a sales contract with defendant. The contract provided for the purchase by the plaintiff of a certain parcel of land and a house, known as model Saratoga K, which the defendant was to build thereon in accordance with the plans and specifications on file in its office. The purchase price was to be $10,440.00, $1,500.00 of which the plaintiff had paid to the defendant, and it was agreed that in the event the plaintiff failed to consummate the transaction within the time allotted, all moneys paid by her were to be forfeited to the defendant as liquidated damages. Plaintiff further alleged that she and the defendant had decided upon the house known as Saratoga K, a model of which she had inspected on the premises of the defendant. As she faced the constructed model of the Saratoga K, the carport was on her right, and the house was built in conformity to this; whereas, in the home that was built for her the carport was on the viewers left, and the house was built in accordance with that. It appears from the record that the model home faced north, while the house constructed for the plaintiff was on a corner lot selected by her and faced approximately southeast. It also appears from the record that the defendant had constructed the house for plaintiff, as well as some 900 other houses in the subdivision, so that it received the maximum benefit from the prevailing breezes, all in accordance with its plans for the development of the subdivision. In other words, the house that was constructed for plaintiff was exactly like the model home she had inspected, except that, being on the opposite side of the street, the floor plan was in contra-position to the floor plan in the model.


PDF Ebook Download "Mary Elizabeth Oneill v. Broadview" Online ePub Kindle